Microsoft Intune vs Hexnode UEM

A head-to-head comparison across 10 scoring categories, pricing, OS coverage, and real-world fit.

3.9
Intune Strong Contender
3.7
Hexnode Strong Contender
7 Intune wins
1 Tied
2 Hexnode wins

Category Radar

Visual overlay of both platforms across all 10 scoring dimensions.

Intune Hexnode
App Management Reporting & Visibility Device Configuration Identity & Directory Compliance & Security Integration & Extensibility Enrollment & Provisioning OS Update & Lifecycle Targeting & Policy Logic Remote Actions & Support
Intune
Hexnode

Category Breakdown

Score comparison across each of the 10 evaluation categories.

App Management
Intune
4.4
Hexnode
4.1
Reporting & Visibility
Intune
4.3
Hexnode
4.2
Device Configuration
Intune
4.1
Hexnode
4.6
Identity & Directory
Intune
4.5
Hexnode
2.8
Compliance & Security
Intune
4.0
Hexnode
3.5
Integration & Extensibility
Intune
4.0
Hexnode
2.8
Enrollment & Provisioning
Intune
3.8
Hexnode
3.8
OS Update & Lifecycle
Intune
3.5
Hexnode
3.0
Targeting & Policy Logic
Intune
3.5
Hexnode
3.2
Remote Actions & Support
Intune
3.0
Hexnode
3.5

Feature Highlights

The 5 individual features with the biggest score difference between these two platforms.

Windows Autopilot

Cloud-based zero-touch provisioning for Windows devices, enabling IT to pre-configure devices that auto-enroll and configure on first boot.

Intune 5.0
vs
Hexnode 3.0

Conditional Access / Zero Trust

Enforce zero-trust access policies that block non-compliant devices from corporate resources like email, VPN, and cloud applications.

Intune 5.0
vs
Hexnode 3.0

Microsoft Entra ID Integration

Sync users and groups from Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD), leverage conditional access policies, and enable Entra-based device compliance.

Intune 5.0
vs
Hexnode 3.0

Certificate-Based Authentication

Authenticate devices and users via client certificates for secure Wi-Fi, VPN, and email access without passwords.

Intune 5.0
vs
Hexnode 3.0

User-Device Affinity Mapping

Map users to their enrolled devices for user-centric targeting, reporting, and multi-device policy management.

Intune 4.0
vs
Hexnode 2.0

Strengths & Weaknesses

Microsoft Intune

Strengths

  • Native Entra ID conditional access delivers best-in-class zero-trust policy enforcement
  • Windows Autopilot provides the smoothest zero-touch deployment for Windows devices
  • Strong MAM/APP capabilities enable data protection on unmanaged BYOD devices
  • Comprehensive Graph API and Power Automate integration for custom workflows

Weaknesses

  • Linux management limited to Ubuntu custom compliance scripts only
  • No native ChromeOS MDM capabilities (Entra ID device sync only)
  • Polling-based compliance checks (8-hour default) lag behind real-time competitors

Hexnode UEM

Strengths

  • Widest OS coverage: iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, tvOS, Fire OS, visionOS
  • Five pricing tiers from $1 to $5.80/device/month offer flexibility for any budget
  • Kiosk browser with URL filtering is a standout feature across all supported platforms
  • No minimum seat requirement makes it accessible to small organisations

Weaknesses

  • Identity integration (Entra ID, Okta) less deep than enterprise leaders
  • Automation and workflow capabilities behind Workspace ONE and Intune
  • SIEM integration limited to syslog forwarding

Pricing Comparison

Intune

Price Range $8–$12/user/month
Model Per-user licensing included in M365 E3/E5; Plan 2 add-on
Min Seats None
Trial 30-day free trial, limited sandbox

Hexnode

Price Range $1–$5.80/device/month
Model 5-tier per-device monthly (Express to Ultra)
Min Seats None
Trial 14-day free trial, full feature access

OS Support

Operating system coverage across both platforms.

Operating System Intune Hexnode
iOS
Android
Windows
macOS
Linux
ChromeOS
tvOS
Fire OS
Total 4 8
The Verdict

Our Recommendation

Microsoft Intune takes the overall lead with a score of 3.9/5.0, winning 7 of 10 categories.

Choose Microsoft Intune if:

Microsoft-centric enterprises with Windows-heavy fleets

Choose Hexnode UEM if:

Organisations managing diverse device types with budget constraints